Close

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Financial Consultant Contacted Clients Before Leaving for Competitor

Although many financial planning companies rely on the relationship between the financial planner and the customer, E-Trade’s customers primarily conduct business online – usually without communicating directly with any of the company’s financial planners. Even so, the company includes a non-solicitation agreement as part of their employment contract with their…

Updated:

In Class Action Defense Win, Supreme Court Holds that Class Arbitration Barred in Absence of Express Consent

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela that an ambiguous arbitration agreement does not provide a sufficient basis to conclude that parties agreed to class arbitration. In a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s decision that the arbitration agreement between…

Updated:

Not All Non-Compete Agreements Are Created Equal

It has become increasingly common over the past few years for employers to include non-compete agreements in their employment contracts. In most cases, they are required to have geographic and time limits, meaning they can only be enforced in a certain geographical area for a certain period of time (usually…

Updated:

Court Denies Jurisdiction in Suit Over Breach of Contract and Failure to pay Royalties Because Plaintiffs’ Contrived Jurisdiction Through Single Purchase

When two founders of a company sued the company that had come into possession of the founders’ patents and intellectual property rights, the district court dismissed their suit for lack of personal jurisdiction. The appellate court affirmed on appeal, finding that the plaintiffs’ lawyer contrived to create personal jurisdiction by…

Updated:

Nevada Supreme Court Enforces Geographical Limit Requirement

When non-compete agreements first started to be used, they needed to establish a geographic perimeter in order to be enforceable. Non-compete agreements were intended to prevent workers from going to work for the competitor across the street and taking clients, vendors, and/or proprietary secrets with them. In order to stay…

Updated:

Seventh Circuit Reinstates Student’s Title IX Claim Finding that Purdue University May Have Discriminated against Men

Reversing the dismissal of the plaintiff’s Title IX complaint against Purdue University by a magistrate judge, the Seventh Circuit breathed new life into a claim against the university by a former student. The student, referred to only as John Doe in the opinion as is common in Title IX suits,…

Updated:

Lubin Austermuehle’s Multi-Million Dollar Libel Suit Results in its Client Obtaining a Full Retraction and Apology as Reported by the Cook County Record

As reported by the Cook County Record, Lubin Austermuehle achieved an immediate settlement for its client one of the largest diamond wholesalers in the world in a libel defamation and slander lawsuit filed in Chicago’s federal court. The Defendant agreed to provide a public full retraction and apology as part…

Updated:

Business Unable to Recover From Insurer When it Urged Insurer not to Settle Lawsuit, and Ultimately was Found Liable for Damages Significantly More Than its Policy Limit

After a surgery went horribly awry at a private surgical center, and the center was sued by the patient, it could not recover the full amount of judgment against it from its insurer an appellate court found. The court found that the surgery center had urged its insurer, who was…

Updated:

Out-of-State Defendants Score Win as Court Strikes Nonresident Class Members for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

An Illinois Federal District court recently handed Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) claim defendants a win of sorts by slashing the size of a putative class, striking all out-of-state residents from the putative class on personal jurisdiction grounds. The case, Garvey v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida, is just…

Updated:

Lubin Austermuehle’s Chicago Non-Compete Agreement and Restrictive Covenant Attorneys Named 2019 Super Lawyers as in the Top 5% of Illinois Attorneys According to the Survey

  Super Lawyers named Chicago and Oak Brook non-compete agreement attorney Peter Lubin a Super Lawyer in the Categories of Class Action, Business Litigation, and Consumer Rights Litigation. Patrick Austermuehle of the Firm was named a Rising Star again and has a great deal of experience as a Chicago restrictive…

Contact Us