Close

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Does the Lanham Act Prohibit Allegedly False Claims of Authorship? – Gensler v. Strabala

Claims for trademark infringement and false advertising under the Lanham Act do not apply to allegedly false assertions of “authorship of a creative work,” according to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. In M. Arthur Gensler, Jr. & Associates, Inc. v. Jay Marshall Strabala, the court…

Updated:

Illinois Court Explains Tortious Interference with Contract Claim – Metro Premium Wines v. Bogle Vineyards, Inc.

The legal theory of tortious interference with a contract protects a business’s relationships from tampering by others. In Metro Premium Wines v. Bogle, the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois explains how the theory is applied. Plaintiff Metro Premium Wines, Inc. (Metro), an Illinois wine distributor, sued Bogle…

Updated:

Suing an Auto Insurer for Underpaying on an Accident Claim – Greenberger v. Geico

In previous posts, we’ve explained some of the ways in which car buyers who have been hoodwinked by dealers and manufacturers can seek to get their money back. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal’s ruling in Greenberger v. Geico concerns another player in the auto industry accused of fraud: an…

Updated:

Recovering Damages for Future Income in Business Breach of Contracts Cases – Hardee’s Food Systems, Inc. v. Hallbeck

A company who is injured by another entity or individual’s breach of a contract is generally entitled to recover damages. In Hardee’s Food Systems. Inc. v. Hallbeck, the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri explains that in addition to recovering based on the immediate economic damage caused by…

Updated:

Car Fraud Cases and the “Economic Loss” Doctrine – Martin v. Ford Motor Co.

For a person seeking to sue for car fraud, it’s not enough to know who swindled you and how they did it. You also need to know what claims to raise in order to recover your losses. In Martin v. Ford Motor Co., the district court for the Eastern District…

Updated:

Retired Supreme Court Justice Stevens Discusses Bush v. Gore

Justice Stevens conducted a detailed analysis of Bush v. Gore, finding it hard to square with the Court’s reticence to date to view partisan gerrymandering as justiciable: If a mere defect in the standards governing voting recount practices can violate the state’s duty to govern impartially, surely it must follow…

Updated:

Video: Used Car Rip-Off

Our Oak Brook auto fraud attorneys bring suit for auto dealer fraud and other car dealer scams such as selling rebuilt wrecks as certified used cars or misrepresenting a car as being in good condition when it is rebuilt wreck or had the odometer rolled back. Super Lawyers has selected…

Updated:

Video: Avoid Used Car Scams

If you have already fallen victim to this scam or other used car frauds our Chicago lemon law and auto fraud lawyers may be able to assist you. Our Chicago auto-fraud attorneys focus on bringing suit for auto-fraud claims. We recently settled a suit involving purchase of $9,000 used car…

Updated:

Today Show Reports: Vin Number Cloning: The Nation’s Biggest Used Car Scam

Our Chicago auto fraud attorneys bring suit for auto dealer fraud and other car dealer scams such as selling rebuilt wrecks as certified used cars or misrepresenting a car as being in good condition when it is rebuilt wreck or had the odometer rolled back. Super Lawyers has selected our…

Updated:

7th Circuit Finds that Dunning Letter Containing Puffery Does not Violate the FDCPA

Debt collector letters to consumers can violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act otherwise known as the FDCPA if they confuse unsophisticated consumers and set time lines that contradict or over shadow the time lines provided in the FDC for validation of debts. Under the FDCPA, a debt collector’s dunning…

Contact Us