Close

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Illinois Court Dismisses Putative Shareholder Class Action, Finding Lack of Alleged Injuries – Noble v. AAR Corp.

An Illinois federal court granted a motion to dismiss in a putative shareholder derivative class action, having already denied the plaintiff’s application for a temporary restraining order (TRO). Noble v. AAR Corp., et al, No. 12 C 7973, memorandum and order (E.D. Ill., Apr. 3, 2013). The plaintiff asserted causes…

Updated:

Best Buy Implements New Non Compete Agreements For its Executives — Our Chicago Non-Complete Agreement Lawyers Represent Businesses and Employees in Chicago Covenant Not to Compete Lawsuits

  Despite the fact that some state laws have been working against non-compete clauses in employee contracts, companies continue to find ways around them. While California has been the least tolerant by banning non-compete clauses altogether, other states, such as Massachusetts, have taken more moderate approaches by seeking merely to…

Updated:

Fight Over Borghese Trademarks — Our Chicago Business Attorneys Represent Families in Closely Held Business Disputes

Despite all of the patents and trademarks out there, one might assume that, at the very least, one’s own family history would be safe. However, according to Georgette Mosbacher, the owner of Borghese Inc., that is not the case. The Borghese family is a noble Italian family, which has included…

Updated:

Class Actions Filed Against Monsanto for GMO Wheat Spreading in the Northwest

  There are multiple reasons why so many people are up in arms against the rising prevalence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in our crops. Aside from the debate as to whether consuming food that has been genetically modified is safe, the issue of contamination is potentially a very serious…

Updated:

Federal Judge Will Decide if NCAA Players Through a Class-Action Lawsuit Will Receive a Share of Video Game Revenues

The world of professional athletes has long been extremely financially rewarding. In recent years, college athletics have approached professional levels where revenue is concerned. The biggest difference is whether or not the players get a cut of the action. Beginning in 2008, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has faced…

Updated:

Wisconsin Class Action Against Insurance Company Remanded to State Court Because of State Law Claims – LaPlant v. Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Our Chicago class action attorneys note that a class action claim against an insurance company, which the defendant had removed to federal court, fell within an exception to the federal jurisdiction statute, according to a federal district judge in LaPlant v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, No. 11-CV-00910, slip…

Updated:

Court Retains Most of a Deceptive Business Practices Putative Class Action Against a Bank for Overdraft Fees – White v. Wachovia Bank

A federal court allowed most causes to proceed in a putative class action against a bank for allegedly fraudulent overdraft fees. White, et al v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., No. 1:08-cv-1007, order (N.D. Ga., Jul. 2, 2008). The plaintiffs, who alleged that the bank had recorded transactions out of chronological order…

Updated:

Chicago Class Action and Consumer Fraud Attorneys Lubin Austermuehle Bring Alleged Counterfeit Rare Wine Lawsuit Against Famed Chicago Chef Charlie Trotter

The Chicago class action attorneys and consumer fraud lawyers at Lubin Austermuehle filed a lawsuit alleging consumer fraud on behalf of our clients against famed Chicago Chef Charlie Trotter claiming that he sold what the specially retained expert concludes is a counterfeit bottle of rare wine. Trotter denies our client’s…

Updated:

Class Action Plaintiffs Awarded $203 Million in Lawsuit Alleging Manipulation of Bank Overdraft Charges – Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo

A California federal court awarded $203 million in damages to a class of plaintiffs in Gutierrez v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 730 F.Supp.2d 1080 (N.D. Cal. 2010). The lawsuit alleged that the defendant bank overcharged the plaintiffs, who held deposit accounts at the bank, for overdraft fees, using a series…

Updated:

Court Reverses Class Certification in Case Alleging Wrongful Withholding of Bonus Compensation – InPhyNet Contracting Services v. Soria — Our Chicago Class Action Attorneys Defend Businesses in Class Cases

A Florida appellate court reversed an order certifying a class of doctors claiming breach of fiduciary duty and other causes of action against their employer. InPhyNet Contracting Services v Soria, 33 So.3d 766 (Fl. Ct. App. 2010). The case began as a suit alleging breach of a covenant not to…

Contact Us