Close

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Court Dismisses ATM Fee Lawsuit Due to Prior Class Action Settlement Agreement

An Illinois court dismissed a lawsuit against a bank alleging deceptive fees for debit card transactions, ruling that a prior settlement in a class action lawsuit, of which the plaintiff was a class member, barred the suit. Schulte v. Fifth Third Bank (“Schulte 2”), No. 09 C 6655, statement (N.D.…

Updated:

Class Certification Granted in Lawsuit Brought by Identity Theft Victim Against Credit Reporting Agency – Osada v. Experian

A consumer sought to certify two classes in a lawsuit against a credit reporting agency, after the agency allegedly refused to remove negative information from his credit report that was the result of identity theft. The lawsuit asserted various claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681…

Updated:

Federal Court Dismisses Certain State Law Claims in Multidistrict Litigation Case Alleging ATM Overdraft Fee Fraud

A federal judge denied most of a motion to dismiss brought by multiple banks in a consolidated case alleging overdraft fee fraud. In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, 694 F.Supp.2d 1302 (S.D. Fla. 2010). The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated multiple claims into a single matter in the…

Updated:

U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Arbitration Agreement Bars Class Action and Class Arbitration Claims – AmEx v. Italian Colors Restaurant

The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that federal law does not permit a court, based on a finding that individual arbitration is cost-prohibitive for a plaintiff, to strike a class arbitration waiver clause in a contract. American Express Co., et al. v. Italians Colors Restaurant, et al (“AmEx”), 570…

Updated:

Court Awards $6.6 Million to Company Alleging False Advertising, Trademark Infringement, and Cybersquatting – Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Quattrocchi

The internet, which is still a new phenomenon to many areas of the law, has greatly expanded the potential for infringement of trademarks and personal names. The act of registering someone else’s trademark or personal name as an internet domain name without authorization is known as “cybersquatting.” While proving a…

Updated:

Class Action Bans Found Improper By Massachusetts’ Highest Court But New Supreme Court Decision Under Cuts that Ruling

With the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion having left many judges and class action attorneys frustrated with the current state of class action lawsuits, a new decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has reawakened hope for plaintiffs to achieve justice in a court of law.…

Updated:

Milwaukee News Story on Our Client’s First Amendment Victory in Federal Court — Our Chicago Libel, Slander and Defamation Lawyers Fight to Protect Our Clients’ First Amendment Rights

  The above video is a news story about our client David Bates’s crusade to publish negative information on the internet about a used car dealer including information about consumer fraud judgments entered against the dealer. The video tells about the consequences of David Bates’s fight — an expensive lawsuit…

Updated:

Our Client’s Crusade to Protect His First Amendment Rights Will Be Featured on Milwaukee News Channel Tonight

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsN1s-OvdKs Our client David Bates was sued by Chicago Motor Cars for criticizing the used car dealership online. We represented him in federal court and arbitration where he prevailed. He continues to exercise his First Amendment rights to criticize the dealership and is seeking to expose what he believes are…

Updated:

Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Appeal of Class Decertification, Finding that Plaintiffs Who Already Settled Still Had Standing – Espenscheid v. DirectSat USA

In an appeal of the decertification of a class action lawsuit, a federal appeals court denied a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding that the plaintiffs/appellants, who settled with the defendants after decertification, still had a stake in the litigation. Espenscheid v. DirectSat USA, LLC, 688…

Updated:

Rapper Ordered to pay $1 Million Plus Reward Allegedly Tries to Evade Judgment

While an offer of reward might not be viewed as a contract (much less a reward offered via social media sites such as Twitter and YouTube), such an offer can still be considered binding. That is the claim made by Armin Augstein who found and returned the laptop belonging to…

Contact Us