Close

Articles Posted in Shareholder Oppression

Updated:

Judge Agrees Shareholders Were Oppressed, But Deliberates Over How to Compensate Them

Investing is supposed to be a long-term strategy to build wealth, but expecting shareholders to wait more than 60 years before they can get a fair return on their investment is far beyond what any investor would consider reasonable. That was allegedly the case for the minority shareholders of Promega…

Updated:

MetLife Allegedly Underreported Claims to Investors

Back in January of 2012, the City of Westland Police and Fire Retirement System filed a class-action lawsuit against MetLife Inc. They alleged that the insurance company used data from the Social Security Administration’s “Death Master File” (DMF) to determine when to stop paying annuities to deceased policyholders, but allegedly…

Updated:

Court Dismisses Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims against Directors for Optimistic Earnings Forecasts

Directors of a corporation owe fiduciary duties to the shareholders of the company. This means that when directors communicate with shareholders about the company, they have a fiduciary duty to exercise due care, good faith and loyalty. Directors can be held personally liable if they intentionally or recklessly mislead shareholders…

Updated:

Company Required to Produce Books and Bank Accounts for Third-Party Monitor During Litigation

After several former employees stole and destroyed internal data from their employer in order to found a competing business, and were sued, the trial court’s appointing of a third party to monitor the new company’s compliance with discovery and restraining orders was not error. Shamrock Corporation has sold antifreeze, motor…

Updated:

Court Finds that Engineering Firm Oppressed Minority Shareholder who Raised Concerns with Owner’s Self-Dealing

As we have written about previously, one of the concerns with purchasing a minority stake in a closely held corporation is the potential for shareholder oppression. This concern is even more relevant when a non-family-member considers buying into a family-owned business. One minority shareholder found this out the hard way…

Updated:

Seventh Circuit Gives a Wide Berth to Business Judgment Rule Following the Deference Required by the Indiana Legistlature in a Shareholder Oppression Case

No withstanding allegations of majority shareholder oppression, the Seventh Circuit rejected those arguments paying deference to the business judgment rule because of the Indiana Legislature’s directive to give officers and directors a wide berth for their business decisions.  The Court observed:  “Indiana has statutorily implemented a strongly pro-management version of…

Contact Us
Start Chat