Close

Articles Posted in Litigation/Business Trials/Business Lawsuits/Business Litigation

Updated:

Commercial Litigation Funding: What is it and How to Get it

Litigation can be an expensive proposition. It used to be that a company with a great claim may not have had the ability to assert that claim because it lacked the ability to pay for the litigation it would take to enforce its rights. Commercial litigation funding has changed this.…

Updated:

ARC Welding v. American Welding — Appellate Court Finds Taking Monies from Reserve Would Constitute a Windfall — Chicago Business Litigation Lawyers near Oak Brook and Naperville

Where an asset purchase agreement between two companies did not contemplate the forfeiture of an entire reserve payment as a result of an audit of assets taking one month longer than originally contemplated, and such a forfeiture would result in a windfall for one of the parties. ARC Welding Supply…

Updated:

Designer Direct v. PNC Financial Services Court Grants Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract Claim Under UCC Provisions — Chicago Business Dispute Lawyers Near Oak Brook

The district court granted summary judgment to a bank on a breach of contract claim where a bank customer was precluded from suing bank for payment of fraudulent checks because customer did not report fraud within 90 days of receiving statement containing copy of first fraudulent check, and account agreement…

Updated:

Mercado v. Verde Energy Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Breach of Contract Claim Alleging that Utilitily Over Charged its Customers — Chicago Business Dispute and Class Action Lawyers

Where a class of consumers sued an energy company for breach of contract, fraud, and unjust enrichment, the district court dismissed some, but not all, of the claims. The district court found that the consumers had sufficiently alleged that the energy company violated its agreement to charge rates for electricity…

Updated:

Trinity v. ColFin Affirms That a Mistake is Not Binding if it is not Relied Upon — Chicago and Oak Brook Real-Estate Litigation Attorneys

Where the mortgage on a development company’s property was mistakenly recorded as satisfied, and then later corrected, the mistaken release did not extinguish the debt, and the contract was still effective. Trinity 83 Development borrowed $2 million from a bank in return for a mortgage on real property and a…

Updated:

Grace Restaurant Acrimony Continues

Chicago’s elite Grace restaurant has been shuttered for nearly a year, but the acrimony surrounding its implosion continues to be played out in Illinois courts. Grace closed abruptly in late 2017 amid a dispute between its star chef and owner, who is now suing the chef and former manager/sommelier for…

Updated:

Shareholder 101: A Failure to Disclose Can Become Subject to a Lawsuit

The primary laws that govern the disclosures to shareholders and the marketplace include the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  These laws have come subject to scrutiny in the Camping World Holdings, Inc.…

Updated:

Google Sues Uber and Otto For Alleged Trade Secret Theft — Our Chicago Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Lawyers Have Extensive Experience Litigating These Types of Cases

There’s no doubt that self-driving cars will be the next big thing in the automobile industry, which is why Google got so upset when a former employee allegedly took trade secrets regarding their self-driving technology to a competitor. Anthony Levandowski claims he has been working on technology for driverless automobiles…

Updated:

New Federal Trade Secret Law Protects Businesses

Before now, if an organization had its trade secrets stolen, its only recourse was usually to bring an action against the perpetrator in state court under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, which was adopted by most states to provide a uniform civil remedy for trade secret theft, or under state…

Updated:

Officer and Shareholder of a Closely Held Illinois Corporation has a Fiduciary Duty not to Compete

Root Consulting Inc. v. William Insull, 2016 WL 806556 (N.D. Ill., March 2, 2016) An officer and shareholder of a closely held corporation has a fiduciary duty not to compete with the company even if he is forced out of the organization. William I. was sued by Root Consulting Inc.…

Contact Us
Start Chat